I wonder if writing is anything except expressing self. Today's readings highlight young climate activists whose passions have necessitated written communication. They are social media giants, vibrant public speakers, and rhetorical warriors, those who are worlds from classrooms, college tracts, and ACT prep courses. These are not the A+ plus students, rather the
desperately committed individuals who've managed to embody intrinsic motivation, rigor, grit, and every other educational concept we pursue so desperately.
These writers
write because they must. They create for progress.
It's an interesting model, then, which teaches writing as merely a collection of words: essays, paragraphs, or poems. It's an even more interesting model that develops writers for graded assignments within the classroom. No one forced Greta Thunberg to use a convincing hook before introducing evidence...yet she does, because she must.
The other day, I learned that three men in
my church were meeting at 5:00 a.m. to
study Greek.
Apparently, a young
Kobe Bryant woke up at 4:00 a.m. to practice his craft.
Fully-formed learning is devoted, joyful, rewarding and sprinkled with insanity.
Developing a writer, then, might actually look like developing the person. Writers are assembly lines and word count codes...in the person we find ample analysis, detailed evidence, and passionate rhetoric, all generated from a passion that makes it necessary. After all, we want this more than we want three pages, double-spaced.
When writing coaches give feedback, we stimulate their passions, question their motives, push on opinions, and search for the person writing the piece. A person can write anything -- and we'd be smart to give them the space to do it.
These persons do not need standard peer reviews...the angsty circles of vague feedback, misplaced praise, and shameful sharing. What if passionate persons declared their ideas and peers gave critical edits? Until peers are taught that respectful, gentle (emphasis on these two words) criticality is much better for their peers, we might benefit from sending them to Reddit, to mock debates, or to community boards. This is, after all, where revolutionaries find themselves becoming linguistic tacticians. They must as they pursue their cause.
Teachers and writing coaches are still responsible for teaching distinct changes. "I notice that you don't use quotation marks consistently, let's take a look at that." "I wonder if you could place this paragprah before the other...we need the background you provide first." There's going to be glaring errors in writing that peers cannot correct...and a teacher is responsible for dealing in specificity. However, all members of the class can share in 1. honest questioning and 2. adding ideas. Questions foster the critical thinking that persons need to refine and strengthen their own perspective, while ideas bring new information to a developing idea.